Analysis of effectiveness of in vitro fertilization using vitrificated and native donor oocytes

Анализ эффективности экстракорпорального оплодотворения при использовании нативных и витрифицированных ооцитов донора
Mykola Gryshchenko 1, Andrey Lutskiy 2 *
More Detail
1 Сlinic of Reproductive Medicine, Kharkov, Ukraine
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kharkov National Medical University, Kharkov, Ukraine
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 4, Issue 50, pp. 30-33. https://doi.org/10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00599
OPEN ACCESS 2772 Views 2103 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Aim: To increase the frequency of pregnancy and delivery rate in in vitro fertilization cycles using native and vitrified donor oocytes.
Methods: Analyzing the results of in vitro fertilization in 62 patients who had oocyte donation programs. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the 1st group included 27 women who had used vitrified donor oocytes, and the 2nd group - 35 patients to whom the native oocytes of the donor were used in the in vitro fertilization cycle. The obtained oocytes were vitrified according to the standard technique using the Cryotech Vitrification kit. To prepare the endometrium for the transfer of embryos, a preparatory hormonal therapy regimen was used and the embryos were transferred in a modified menstrual cycle.
Results: Studies have shown that the application of the vitrification method in assisted reproductive technology programs allows to achieve clinical results that are not inferior and even significantly exceed the effectiveness of treatment in cycles with native donor oocytes in such parameters as clinical pregnancies, implantation rate and labor.
Conclusion: Vitrification is an effective method of cryopreservation of oocytes, which allows to preserve the functional properties of the eggs and, after their fertilization, to obtain embryos with high implantation potential.

CITATION

Gryshchenko M, Lutskiy A. Analysis of effectiveness of in vitro fertilization using vitrificated and native donor oocytes. Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan. 2018;4(50):30-3. https://doi.org/10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00599

REFERENCES

  • Kalugina A. S., Kravchuk YA. N., Shly’kova S. A., et al. Vliyanie kachestva poluchenny’h e`mbrionov na ishody’ programm kriokonservacii pri sravnenii metodov medlennogo zamorajivaniya i vitrifikacii v ciklah VRT (Effect of the obtained embryos quality on the outcomes of cryopreservation programs in comparison of slow freezing and vitrification methods in ART cycles) [in Russian]. Jurnal akusherstva i jenskih bolezney. 2012; LXI (4): 48-53.
  • Smirnova A.A., Tur-Kaspa I. Kriokonservaciya oocitov cheloveka: klinicheskie ishody’. (Cryopreservation of human oocytes: clinical outcomes) [in Russian]. Problemy’ reprodukcii. 2005; 1:14-8.
  • Andreeva E.A., Khonina N.A., Pasman N.M., Cherny’h E.R. Citokiny’ v regulyacii ovarial’nogo follikulogeneza (Cytokines in regulation of ovarian folliculogenesis) [in Russian]. Problemy’ reprodukcii. 2017; 1:8-14.
  • W.Wang, R.Li, M.Chang, T.Wang, C.Witz, D.Williamz, J.Griffith, J.Skorupski, J.Gill, S. Bello, G. Haddad. Efficiency comparison of eggs and embryos in a shared egg donor program. Human reproduction. 2014; 29(1):145.
  • Cobo A., Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification:a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2011;96:277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030
  • Kuwayama M. et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 4(1):23–8.
  • Cobo A., Kuwayama M. Comparison of concomitant outcome schieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(6):1657-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.050
  • Bos-Mikich A., Wood M., Candy C. et al. Cytogenetic analysis and developmental potential of vitrified oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 1995; 53:780-784. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.4.780
  • Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The CryoTop method. Theriogenology. 2007; 67:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014
  • Gardner D. K., Vella P., Lane M., Wagley L. et al. Cuture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for mutiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998; 69: 84–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00438-X
  • Maureen J. Wood. Vitrification of oocytes. Obstetrician Gynaecologist. 2012; 14:45–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 4667.2011.00078.x
  • Thomas J. Kim, Seung Wook Hong. Successful live birth from vitrified oocytes after 5 years of cryopreservation. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2011; 28:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9487-3