Assessment of Outcomes of the Modified Stoppa Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Nurgeldi Nurkenuly Manap 1 * ,
Nagmet Kapanovich Mursalov 1,
Mukhtar Tolegenovich Abilmazhinov 2 More Detail
1 National Scientific Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician N.D. Batpenov, Astana, Kazakhstan
2 Astana Medical University
* Corresponding Author
OPEN ACCESS
68 Views
0 Downloads
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, N.M. and N.M.; methodology, N.M., N.M. and M.A.; validation, N.M. and N.M.; formal analysis, N.M. and M.A.; investigation, N.M. and N.M.; resources, N.M. and N.M.; data curation, N.M.; writing – original draft preparation, N.M.; writing – review and editing, N.M., N.M. and M.A.; visualization, N.M.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, N.M. and M.A.; funding acquisition, N.M., N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
ABSTRACT
Aims. To evaluate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of pelvic bone injuries based on clinical (sex distribution, fracture type), surgical (duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, quality of reduction), and functional outcome (hip joint function). Materials and methods. A total of 31 patient were included in a retrospective cohort study from 2019 until March 2022 with various injuries of acetabulum in the N.D. Batpenov National Scientific Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics (NSCTO).The inclusion criteria for this study were: patients with acetabulum injuries, and who underwent surgical interventions using one of two surgical approaches (modified Stoppa, ilioinguinal approaches), patients over 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: other operative approaches to pelvic bones and patients under 18 years of age. 21 patients underwent surgery with the use of modified Stoppa approach (group A) and 10 surgeries were performed using the ilioinguinal approach (group B). Efficiency was evaluated by comparison of duration of surgical procedures, amount of blood lossbetween groups, size of skin incision, quality of reduction and functional outcomes. Results. There are males – 18(58.1%), females – 13(41.9%) in the study. The clinical study results showed that average volume of intraoperative blood loss and size of skin incision were significantly less during Stoppa approach then ilioinguinal approach though average duration of surgical procedures did not reveal significant differences between two groups. Average duration of surgical procedures did not reveal significant differences between two groups – 109.5 min (±54.7) among group A and 126 min (±58.9) in group B. The volume of intraoperative blood loss averaged 338±254.5 ml of blood for the total sample. The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 525.0 ±322.5 ml of blood in group B, which is more than twice the estimated blood loss for group A (250 ±157.3 ml). When using a Stoppa approach, the length of the cutaneous surgical incision averaged at 8.8 ± 1.5 cm, while with an ilioinguinal approach, this value was estimated at 20.6 ± 8.5 cm, which suggests a favorable cosmetic effect of Stoppa approach. Conclusion. The positive results obtained with the modified Stoppa approach, which are reflected in a reduction in the length of the skin incision and the amount of intraoperative blood loss, suggest that the use of this approach in clinical practice provides an opportunity to improve the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures by obtaining variability in the study of surgical approach. Nevertheless, the frequency and complexity of the occurring pelvic bone injuries dictate the need for further search and improvement of more optimal access options for surgical treatment.
CITATION
Manap NN, Mursalov NK, Abilmazhinov MT. Assessment of Outcomes of the Modified Stoppa Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med Kaz. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/15614
REFERENCES
- Antell NB, Switzer JA, Schmidt AH. Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Am AcadOrthop Surg. 2017; 25(8): em585. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00510.
- Park KS, Chan CK, Lee GW et al. Outcome of alternative approach to displaced acetabular fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(2): em93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.029.
- Kacra BK, Arazi M, Cicekcibasi AE, et al. Modified medial Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures: an anatomic study. J Trauma. 2011; 71(5): em1344. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182092e8b.
- Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 151: 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198009000-00012.
- Rocca G, Spina M, Mazzi M. Anterior combined endopelvic (ACE) approach for the treatment of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures: a new proposal. Injury. 2014; 45(12): em15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.016.
- Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M. Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(2): em236. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24056.
- Fensky F, Lehmann W, Ruecker A, Ruecker JM. Ilioinguinal approach: indication and technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(1): em13. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001194.
- Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (305): em123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199408000-00015.
- Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Böstman O. A new approach to the internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 1(12): em32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199312000-00007.
- Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Kiljunen V. Modified and new approaches for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Injury. 2007; 38(4): em441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.020.
- Negrin LL, Seligson D. Results of 167 consecutive cases of acetabular fractures using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: a case series. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017; 26(4): em66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0563-6.
- Deng C, Ni WD, Guo SQ, Luo G, Shui W, Qiao B. Operative treatment of delayed acetabular fractures through combined anterior and Kocher-Langenbeck approaches. ZhonghuaWaiKeZaZhi. 2018; 56(3): em200. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.03.006.
- Erem M, Copuroglu C, Copuroglu E, Ciftdemir M, Ozcan M, Saridogan K. Effects of the incısıon preference ın acetabular surgery on the postoperatıve functıonal outcomes. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019; 22(6): em868. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_455_18.
- Frietman B, Biert J, Edwards MJR. Patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for an acetabular fracture. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100(5): em645. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ-2017-0871.R3..
- Liu ZJ, Jia J, Zhang YG, Tian W, Jin X, Hu YC. Internal Fixation of Complicated Acetabular Fractures Directed by Preoperative Surgery with 3D Printing Models. Orthop. Surg. 2017; 9(2): em260. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12324.
- Wu H, Zhang L, Guo X, Jiang X. Meta-analysis of modified Stoppa approach and ilioinguinal approach in anterior pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Medicine. 2020; 99: 4(e18395). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018395.
- Sagi HC, Afsari A, Dziadosz D. The anterior intra-pelvic (modified Rives-Stoppa) approach for fixation of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24: 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dd0b84.
- Gras F, Marintschev I, Grossterlinden L, Rossmann M, Graul I, Hofmann GO, Rueger J, Lehmann W. The anterior intrapelvic approach for acetabular fractures using approachspecific instruments and an anatomical-preshaped 3-dimensional suprapectineal plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: e210–e216. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000829.
- Rocca G, Spina M, Mazzi M. Anterior combined endopelvic (ACE) approach for the treatment of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures: a new proposal. Injury. 2014; 45(Suppl 6): S9–S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.016.
- Meena S, Sharma PK, Mittal S, Sharma J, Chowdhury B. Modified Stoppa approach versus ilioinguinal approach for anterior acetabular fractures; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2017: 5: 6–12.
- Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(11): 1632e1645.
- Haddad RJ, Cook SD, Brinker MR. A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(1): 2e8.
- Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald JRH. Clinical and rentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty: a new hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 13: 3e40.
- Shazar N, Eshed I, Ackshota N, Hershkovich O, Khazanov A, Herman A. Comparison of acetabular fracture reduction quality by the ilioinguinal or the anterior intrapelvic (modified Rives-Stoppa) surgical approaches. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(6): em319. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000435627.56658.53.
- Chen K, Ji Y, Huang Z, Navinduth R, Yang F, Sun T, Xiong Z, Yao Sh, Ahn J, Guo X. Single modified ilioinguinal approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures involving both columns. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(11): em434. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001303.
- Yao S, Chen K, Ji Y, Zhu F, Zeng L, Xiong Z, Sun T, Yang F, Liu J, Guo X. Supra-ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures: reduction quality and early clinical results of a retrospective study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019; 14(1): em9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1428-y.
- Al Adawy AS, Abdel Aziz AH, El Sherief FA, Mahmoud WS, Mabrook M, El-Sayed Hassan Y. Modified Stoppa as an alternative surgical approach for fixation of anterior fracture acetabulum: a randomized control clinical trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020; 15(1): em12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01660-3.
- Verbeek DO, Ponsen KJ, van Heijl M, Goslings JC. Modified Stoppa approach for operative treatment of acetabular fractures: 10-year experience and mid-term follow-up. Injury. 2018; 49(6): em1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.031.