Comparative analysis of immunochromatographic membrane test’s efficiency for the forensic detection of semen in cases of sexual assaults

Сравнительная оценка эффективности иммунохроматографических методов обнаружения спермы при судебно-медицинской экспертизе половых преступлений
Gaukhar Zhumagulova 1 * , Tolkin Zhakupova 1, Vsevolod Ossipov 2, Gulzhan Zhakenova 3
More Detail
1 No2 Department of Forensic Medicine, Astana Medical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan
2 Department of Forensic Medicine, Astana Medical University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan
3 Institute of Forensic Expertise in Astana, Center of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 4, Issue 50, pp. 6-14. https://doi.org/10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00603
OPEN ACCESS 3103 Views 4041 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The article presents a review of the literature of native and foreign authors on the application of confirmatory methods for determining the presence of sperm on material evidences. The article compares the main immunochromatographic methods. It provides analysis of the acts of forensic medical reports on the examination of sexual crimes.
Keywords: sexual assaults, forensic examination of material evidences, detection of semen, immunochromatographic membrane tests

CITATION

Zhumagulova G, Zhakupova T, Ossipov V, Zhakenova G. Comparative analysis of immunochromatographic membrane test’s efficiency for the forensic detection of semen in cases of sexual assaults. Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan. 2018;4(50):6-14. https://doi.org/10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00603

REFERENCES

  • A.A. Gusarov «Sovremennoe sostojanie jekspertizy veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stv biologicheskogo proishozhdenija v gosudarstvennyh sudebno-jekspertnyh uchrezhdenij Rossijskoj Federacii i puti ee sovershenstvovanija» (The current condition of expertise of material evidence of biological origin in government forensic institutions of the Russian Federation and ways of it’s improvement) [in Russian]. Moskva. 2012; 3.
  • T.Z. Zhakupova «Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stv biologicheskogo proishozhdenija» (Forensic examination of material evidences of biological origin) [in Russian]. Astana. 2009; 5.
  • L.O. Barsegjanc, «Sudebno-medicinskoe issledovanie veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stv» (Forensic examination of material evidences) [in Russian]. Moskva. 2005; 214.
  • D.V. Dehanov, N.V. Vlaskova «Ispol’zovanie sovremennyh vysokointensivnyh istochnikov izluchenija dlja obnaruzhenija sledov pri biologicheskih i molekuljarno-biologicheskih jekspertizah» (The use of modern high-intensity radiation sources for the detection of traces during biological and molecular biological examinations) [in Russian]. Sudebno-medicinskaja jekspertiza. 2011; 6:44-45.
  • V.L. Sidorov, O.D. Jagmurov. «Prakticheskij jeffekt ot vnedrenija kolorimetricheskoj i immunohimicheskoj metodik pri ustanovlenii nalichija spermy na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah» (The practical effect of the introduction of colorimetric and immunochemical methods in determining the presence of sperm on physical evidence) [in Russian]. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. I.P. Pavlova. 2013; 4:59-61.
  • V.L. Sidorov «Ob aktual’nosti i jeffektivnosti primenenija kolorimetricheskogo metoda dlja orientirovochnogo ustanovlenija nalichija spermy na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah» (On the relevance and effectiveness of the use of the colorimetric method for the approximate determination of the presence of sperm on physical evidence) [in Russian]. Medicinskaja jekspertiza i pravo. 2012; 2:39-40.
  • H. Evers, F. Heidorn, C. Gruber, G. Lasczkowski, M. Ribe, R. Dettmeyer, M.A. Verhoff, «Investigative strategy for the forensic detection of sperm traces». Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009; 5(3):182-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-009-9092-x
  • Ju. A.Aver’janova, O.A. Dmitrieva. Aktual’nost’ sudebno-biologicheskogo issledovanija spermy v zavisimosti ot davnosti obrazovanija obrazca (The relevance of the forensic biological study of sperm, depending on the age of sample formation) [in Russian]. Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2006; 3(20):37-39.
  • O.A. Dmitrieva, T.M.Fedchenko. «Zashhishhennyj» polovoj akt – odna iz prichin neobnaruzhenija spermy pri sudebnobiologicheskom issledovanii» (“Protected” sexual intercourse is one of the reasons for not detecting sperm in a forensic biological study”) [in Russian]. Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2001; 3:37-38.
  • T.Z. Zhakupova. Vlijanie rjada faktorov na morfologicheskuju strukturu spermatozoidov pri sudebno-medicinskoj jekspertize muzhelozhstva (The influence of a number of factors on the morphological structure of spermatozoa in the forensic examination of pederasty) [in Russian]. Astana. 2006; 20.
  • M.Ju. Kostenko. Morfologicheskie izmenenija spermy pri infekcijah (Morphological changes in sperm at infections) [in Russian]. Nauka, obrazovanie, obshhestvo. 2017; 4:50-51.
  • G.A. Zhakenova. Sudebno-medicinskaja ocenka sohrannosti spermatozoidov na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah posle vozdejstvija nekotoryh faktorov. (Forensic assessment of the safety of sperm on material evidences after exposure to certain factors) [in Russian]. Astana. 2006; 24.
  • O.L. Gorbunova, L.G.Zorina. Obnaruzhenie spermy vo vlagalishhe jeksgumirovannogo trupa (Sperm detection in the vagina of an exhumed corpse) [in Russian]. Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2009; 49.
  • I.V. Kadieva, A.Z.Rusina, N.L.Shherbakova, A.K.Laskeeva, V.I.Antonov, V.Ju.Gavrichkov, S.V. Pljuhin. Obnaruzhenie spermy na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah, podvergshihsja dlitel’nomu hraneniju i vozdejstviju faktorov okruzhajushhej sredy (Detection of sperm on evidences that has been exposed to prolonged storage and environmental factors) [in Russian]. Zdravoohranenie Chuvashii. 2017; 2:94-97.
  • A.D.Kubegenova. Rekomendacii po iz#jatiju biologicheskogo materiala s mesta proisshestvija (Recommendations for the removal of biological material from the scene of crime) [in Russian]. Sudebnaja medicina Kazahstana. 2017; 10-13.
  • N.V. Malysh, D.B. Umarova. Organizacija kontrolja kachestva sudebno-biologicheskih jekspertiz (Organization of quality control of forensic biological examinations) [in Russian]. Sudebnaja medicina Kazahstana. 2017; 1(5):29-32.
  • Wasserstrom A., Frumkin D., Davidson A., Sphitzen M., Herman Y., Gafny R. Demonstration of DSI-semen – A novel DNA methylation – based forensic semen identification assay. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2013; 7(1):136-142. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.009
  • N.N.Mihajlova, O.M.Zoroastrov. Opredelenie nalichija prostatospecificheskogo antigena na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah s pomoshh’ju testov SERATEC PSA SEMIQUANT i pribora SERAQUANT (Determination of the presence of prostate-specific antigen on evidences using tests SERATEC PSA SEMIQUANT and device SERAQUANT) [in Russian]. Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2011; 3:40-42.
  • N.N. Mihajlova. Ispol’zovanie pribora «SERAQUANT» dlja ustanovlenija nalichija krovi cheloveka i spermy v sledah na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah (Using the device «SERAQUANT» to establish the presence of human blood and sperm in the traces of material evidence) [in Russian]. Problemy jekspertizy v medicine. 2013; 6:26-28.
  • H. Nakanishi, Masaaki Hara, Shirushi Takahashi, Aya Takada, Kazuyuki Sato. Evaluation of forensic examination of extremely aged seminal stains. Journal of Legal medicine. 2014; 1-4.
  • I. Sato, M. Yoshiike, T. Yamasaki, K. Yoshida, S. Takano, T. Mulai, T. Iwamoto. A dot-blot immunoassay for semen identification using a polyclonal antibody against semenogelin, a powerful seminal marker. Forensic Science International. 2001; 122(1):27- 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00435-2 
  • I. Sato, M. Sagi, A. Ishiwari, H. Nishijima, E. Ito, T. Mukai. Use of the «SMITEST» PSA card to identify the presence of prostate- specific antigen in semen and male urine. Forensic Science International. 2002; 127:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0379-0738(02)00111-1
  • Independent forensics. Bystroe obnaruzhenie semennoj zhidkosti cheloveka (RSID-Semen). List tehnicheskoj informacii i protokol dlja ispol’zovanija s universal’nym buferom (Rapid detection of human semen (RSID-Semen). Technical information sheet and protocol for use with universal buffer) [in Russian]. 1-4.
  • O.M. Zoroastrov, N.N. Mihajlova, S.V. Gurtovaja, N.R.Vdovina, I.V.Kondratova. Ustanovlenie nalichija krovi cheloveka i prostatospecificheskogo antigena v sledah na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah immunohromatograficheskim metodom s ispol’zovaniem pribora Seraquant (Establishing the presence of human blood and prostate-specific antigen in traces on material evidence by the immunochromatographic method using the Seraquant instrument) [in Russian]. Moskva. 15.
  • Lunetta P, Sippel H. Positive prostate specific antigen (PSA) reaction in post-mortem rectal swabs: a cautionary note. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2009; 16(7):397-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2009.04.002
  • V.L. Sidorov, O.D. Jagmurov. Sravnitel’nyj analiz metodik, napravlennyh na opredelenie dokazatel’nogo nalichija spermy na veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stvah (Comparative analysis of methods aimed at determining the evidence of the presence of sperm on physical evidence) [in Russian]. Medicinskaja jekspertiza i pravo. 2014; 4:44-47.
  • A. Laffan, I. Sawyer, Quinones I., Daniel B. Evaluation of semen presumptive tests for use at crime scenes. Med.Sci.Law. 2011; 1(51):11-17. https://doi.org/10.1258/msl.2010.010040
  • M.E. Chang. A comparison of Rapid Stain Identification Test For Semen (RSID-Semen), Seratec PSA Semiquant, and ABA card p30 Tests for the Forensic Identification of Seminal Fluid. Los Angeles. 2011; 27-29.
  • Old J., Brett A. Schweers, Pravat W. Boonlayangoor, Fisher B., Miller K.W.P., Reich K. Developmental validation of RSIDSemen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012; 57(2):489-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01968.x
  • M.Hobbs, M.J.Steiner, K.D.Rich, M.F.Gallo, A.Alam, M.Rahman, P.Menezes, T.Chipato, L.Warner, M.Macаluso. Good performance of rapid prostate-specific antigen test for detection of semen exposure in women: implications for qualitative research. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2009; 36(8):501-506. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2b4bf
  • Pang B.C.M, Cheung B.K.K., Identification of human semenogelin in membrane stripe test as an alternative method for the detection of semen. Forensic Science International. 2007; 169:27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.021
  • Itaru Sato, Filippo Barni, Miki Yoshiike, Cesare Rapone, Andrea Berti, Shinichi Nakaki, Kazuki Yamazaki, Fumio Ishikawa, Teruaki Iwamoto. Applicability of Nanotrap Sg as a semen detection kit before male-specific DNA profiling in sexual assaults. Journal of Legal Medicine. 2007; 121:315-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0084-z
  • H.Holtkotter, K.Schwender, P.Wiegand, H.Peiffer, M.Vennemann. Improving body fluid identification in forensic trace evidence – construction of an immunochromatographic test array to rapidly detect up to five body fluids simultaneously. Journal of Legal Medicine. 2018; 132:83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1724-1
  • R.Miteva, S.Yotov, P.Georgiev, I.Fasulkov Determination of species specific antigen (PSA) in semen. Trakia. Journal of Sciences, 2003; 3(4):64-68.
  • Shuntaro Fujimoto, Sho Manabe, Chie Morimoto, Yuya Hamano, Keiji Tamaki, 2017). Effect of absence of spermatozoa on microrna-based identification, Forensic Science International: Genetics Suppleement Series. 2017; 6:238–240. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.099
  • Emily S. Boward, Stacey L.Wilson. A comparison of ABAcard p30 and RSID-Semen test kit for forensic semen identification. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2013; 20(8):1126-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.09.007
  • M.Hobbs, M.J.Steiner, K.D.Rich, M.F.Gallo, F.Maria, L.Warner, M.Macaluso. Vaginal swab specimen processing methods influence performance of rapid semen detection tests: a cautionary tale. Contraception. 2010; 82(3):291-5. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.022
  • V.Peonim, W.Worasuwannarak, K.Sujirachato, S.Teerakamchai, S. Srisont, J.Udnoon, U.Chudoung. Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2013; 20(6):578-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.009
  • Josephine Aho, Anita Kaushik, Soumaila Laye Diakite, Kovana Macel Loua, Vinh-Kim Nguen, Selim Rashed. Biological Validation of Self – Reported Condom Use Among Sex Workers in Guinea. AIDS and Behavior, 2010; 14(6):1287-93. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10461-009-9602-6
  • Sara E. Bitner False Positives Observed on the Seratec PSA SemiQuant Cassette Test with Condom Lubricants. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012; 57(6):1-4.