Comparison of blood gas analysis parameters, biochemical tests and hematological parameters in geriatric patients admitted to the emergency department

Ayşegül Bilge 1, Hatice Şeyma Akça 2 * , Abuzer Özkan 3
More Detail
1 Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Karaman Education and Research Hospital, University of Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey, Karaman, Turkey
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Karaman Education and Research Hospital, University of Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey, Karaman, Turkey
3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Scienses, Istanbul, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 60-64. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/13145
OPEN ACCESS 1043 Views 714 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Aim: The primary aim is to compare blood gas parameters (sodium, potassium, glucose, hemoglobin, hematocrit) with biochemical test and hospital hemogram results and thus to investigate the compatibility of blood gas estimation with other laboratory tests in geriatrics. The secondary aim is to compare the effects of these parameters on patient mortality.
Material and methods: Patients over the age of 65 who applied to the emergency department were included in our retrospective study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., version 20.0; Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyzes applying to the emergency department. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.
Results: 102 patients were included in our study and 51.97% were male. 9.8% of our patients died. The diagnostic test performance analyzes of BG (blood gas) hemoglobin, hemoglobin, BG hematocrit, hematocrit, BG glucose, glucose, BG sodium, sodium, BG potassium, potassium in predicting mortality revealed with the AUC(area under curve) value being calculated as unsuccessful for BG hemoglobin, hemoglobin, BG hematocrit and hematocrit (AUC value: 0.47, 0.45, 0.46, 0.50). AUC (area under curve) value being calculated as weak for BG glucose, glucose and BG sodium (AUC value: 0.64, 0.61, 0.63 respectively). AUC value being calculated as medium for sodium (AUC value: 0.71).
Conclusion: There is no superiority of blood gas parameters over hematological and biochemical parameters in predicting mortality in the geriatric patient group. However, blood gas parameters can be used in patient management as they correlate with other laboratory tests.
Keywords: Blood gas parameters, geriatrics, sodium, glucose, hemoglobin

CITATION

Bilge A, Akça HŞ, Özkan A. Comparison of blood gas analysis parameters, biochemical tests and hematological parameters in geriatric patients admitted to the emergency department. J CLIN MED KAZ. 2023;20(2):60-4. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/13145

REFERENCES

  • Uysal E, Acar YA, Kutur A, Cevik E, Salman N, Tezel O. How reliable are electrolyte and metabolite results measured by a blood gas analyzer in the ED? Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.025
  • Mirzazadeh M, Morovat A, James T, Smith L, Kirby J, Shine B. Point-of-care testing of electrolytes and calcium using the blood gas analysers: it is time we trusted the results. Emerg Med J. 2016; 33:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-204669
  • Cox CJ. Acute care testing. Bood gases and electrolytes at the point of care. Clin Lab Med. 2001;21(2):321–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30037-4
  • Jain A, Subhan I, Joshi M. Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes. Int J Emerg Med. 2009; 2:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12245-009-0091-1
  • Gavala A, Myrianthefs P. Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of hematocrit, hemoglobin, and electrolyte concentrations. Heart Lung. 2017; 46:246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.04.003
  • Allardet-Servent J, Lebsir M, Dubroca C, Fabrigoule M, Jordana S, Signouret T et al. Point-of care versus central laboratory measurements of hemoglobin, hematocrit, glucose, bicarbonate and electrolytes: A prospective observational study in critically ill patients. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12(1):e0169593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169593
  • Triplett KE, Wibrow BA, Norman R, Hince DA, Hardy LE, Tan S et al. Can the blood gas analyser results be believed? A prospective multicentre study comparing haemoglobin, sodium and potassium measurements by blood gas analysers and laboratory auto-analysers. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019;47(2):120-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X19840046
  • Konuksever D, Yucel SP, Bölük O, Kılıç BO, Taşar MA. Compatibility levels between blood gas analysis and central laboratory hemoglobin and electrolyte tests in pediatric patients: A single-center experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023;33(2):107-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14567
  • Altunok İ, Aksel G, Eroglu SE. Correlation between sodium, potassium, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and glucose values as measured by a laboratory autoanalyzer and a blood gas analyzer.2019;37(6):1048-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.045