Pregnancy after 40 years old - is a realized reality?
Беременность после 40 лет – осознанная реальность?
Gulnara Utepova 1
More Detail
1 Department of In Vitro Fertilization, National research center for maternal and child health of the corporate fund «UMC», Astana, Kazakhstan
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 3, Issue 45 special issue, pp. 44-49.
https://doi.org/10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00512
OPEN ACCESS
3144 Views
2745 Downloads
ABSTRACT
Introduction: An increase in a woman's age at her frst birth has occurred across all age groups but has been most pronounced in relatively older women, such that one out of every fve women in the world has her frst child after the age of 35, an 8-fold increase over the previous generation. Objective: What do infertile women in Каzakhstan over the age 40 understand of the relationship between age and fertility?
Methods: 82 medical card women over the 40 years old, who had consultation in IVF department of National research Center of Maternity & Child Care, were retrospectively analyzed. The data include responses to the interview questions ‘What information did you have about fertility and age before you started trying to get pregnant?’ and ‘What did you learn once you proceeded with fertility treatment?’, as well as any discussion of these topics.
Results: 31.7% of women in our cohort frst attempted conception at an average age more than 35 and 61% stated that they had some awareness that fertility declined after age 40. Yet 90.2% of women expected their fertility to decline gradually until menopause at around 50 years and 30.5% reported that they expected to get pregnant without difculty at age 40. When entering into the medical realm, very few participants had considered the possibility that they would need IVF and 53.7% reported being ‘shocked’ and ‘alarmed’ to discover that their understandings of the rapidity of age-related reproductive decline were inaccurate. There were 97.6% of women who advocated better fertility education earlier in life so that men and women could make more informed childbearing decisions and 80.5% who indicated that with more information about declining fertility they might have attempted conception at an earlier age.
Conclusion: We found that women in our country did not have a clear understanding of the age at which fertility begins to decline. Over half of participants were ‘shocked’ to discover that the chances of conception at their ages were much lower than they had anticipated. As a result, we conclude that while the failure to appreciate the true biological relationship between aging and fertility may reflect inaccessibility or misinterpretation of information, it is not suffcient to explain the decades-long socio-demographic phenomenon of delayed childbearing.
REFERENCES
- Chandra A, Martinez G, Mosher W, Abma J, Jones J. , Fertility, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health of U.S. Women: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control. 2005.
- Matthews T.J., Hamilton B.E. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life, NCHS Data Brief ; 2009; 1-8.
- SART Clinic summary report, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2009
- Tough S., Benzies K., Fraser-Lee N., Newburn-Cook C. Factors influencing childbearing decisions and knowledge of perinatal risks among Canadian men and women, Matern Child Health J. 2007; 189-198.
- Bretherick KL, Fairbrother N, Avila L, Harbord SH, Robinson WP. Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know?, Fertil Steril. 2010; (93); 2162-2168.
- Cooke A., Mills T.A., Lavender T. «Informed and uninformed decision making’–Women's reasoning, experiences and perceptions with regard to advanced maternal age and delayed childbearing: a meta-synthesis», Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; (47): 1317-1329.
- Earle S., Letherby G. Conceiving time? Women who do or do not conceive, Sociol Health Illn. 2007; (29): 233-250.
- Bunting L., Boivin J. Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people, Hum Reprod. 2008; (23):1858-1864.
- Friese C., Becker G., Nachtigall R.D. Rethinking the biological clock: eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility, Soc Sci Med. 2006; (63): 1550-1560.
- Schwartz D., Mayaux M.J. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS, N Engl J Med. 1982; (306): 404-406.
- ASRM Age-related fertility decline: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril. 2008; (90): 154-S155.
- Leridon H., Slama R. The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology, Hum Reprod. 2008; (23): 1312-1319.
- Bavan B., Porzig E., Baker V.L. An assessment of female university students' attitudes toward screening technologies for ovarian reserve, Fertil Steril. 2011; (96): 1195-1199.
- Mac Dougall K., Beyene Y., Nachtigall R.D. ‘Inconvenient biology:’ advantages and disadvantages of first-time parenting after age 40 using in vitro fertilization, Hum Reprod. 2012; (27): 1058-1065.