Use of a device for bone allograft channeling in an experiment with rabbits: Narrative review

Alexander Rudenko 1 2 * , Berik Tuleubaev 1 2, Nurettin Heybeli 1 2
More Detail
1 Department of Surgical Diseases, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
2 Department of Emergency Trauma, Multidisciplinary Regional Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Professor Kh.Zh.Makazhanov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
* Corresponding Author
J CLIN MED KAZ, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp. 65-69. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11722
OPEN ACCESS 1047 Views 846 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Aim: To investigate the method of antibiotic impregnation of the femoral bone head (prepared according to the Marburg bone bank system) using a patented device designed for uniform channeling followed by deep soaking of the bone graft spongy tissue with drug solutions.
Materials and methods: Femoral bone heads prepared according to the Marburg bone bank system and impregnated with gentamicin were used in the experiment. Four groups were formed depending on the impregnation method. A whole femoral head was used in groups I and II, a perforated femoral head - in groups III and IV. In groups I and III, antibiotic impregnation was carried out simultaneously with heat treatment of the femoral heads, in groups II and IV – after heat treatment. The perforated, treated, gentamicin-soaked femoral bone head was compared to the "PerOssal" beads soaked in gentamicin. The degree of influence on the S. aureus strains was determined using the agar diffusion method.
Results and conclusion: The results indicate the presence of antimicrobial activity in the antibiotic-impregnated allograft in all groups. However, the growth inhibition zone was lower in groups I and III. The antimicrobial activity of gentamicin in the I and III was lower than in the groups II and IV.  ​An increase in the diffusion of the antibiotic is facilitated by the perforation of the bone allograft according to the developed method using a patented device. It has been established that perforation and soaking of the bone allograft in an antibiotic solution increases the antibiotic impregnation of the bone graft.

CITATION

Rudenko A, Tuleubaev B, Heybeli N. Use of a device for bone allograft channeling in an experiment with rabbits: Narrative review. J CLIN MED KAZ. 2022;19(1):65-9. https://doi.org/10.23950/jcmk/11722

REFERENCES

  • Bozhkova SA, Novokshonova AA, Konev VA. Current trends in local antibacterial therapy of periprosthetic infection and osteomyelitis [In Russian]. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2015;(3):92-107. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2015-0-3-92-107
  • Witse E, Persen L, Benum P, Bergh K. Cortical allograft as a vehicle for antibiotic delivery. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):481-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041457
  • Witse E, Persen L, Benum P, Bergh K. Release of netilmicin and vancomycin from cancellous bone. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73(2): 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164702753671812
  • Khoo PP, Michalak KA, Yates PJ, Megson SM, Day RE, Wood DJ. Iontophoresis of antibiotics into segmental allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1149-57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17500
  • Wits0 E, Persen L, Benum P, Bergh K. Release of netilmicin and vancomycin from cancellous bone. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73(2):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164702753671812
  • Mouzopoulos G, Kanakaris NK, Kontakis G, Obakponovwe O, Townsend R, Giannoudis PV. Management of bone infections in adults: the surgeon's and microbiologist's perspectives. Injury. 2011;42(5):18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70128-0
  • Hanberger H, Edlund C, Furebring M, Giske C, Melhus A, Nilsson LE, et al. Rational use of aminoglycosides - review and recommendations by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Scand J Infect Dis. 2013;45(3):161-75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2012.747694
  • Vinogradova TP, Lavrischeva GI. Regeneration and bone transplantation [In Russian]. Moskow: Medicine; 1974. 274 p.
  • Lavrischeva GI, Onoprienko GA. Morphological and clinical aspects of reparative regeneration of supporting organs and tissues [In Russian]. Moscow: Medicine. 1996. 195 p.
  • Ostroverkhov GE, Bomash YuM, Lubotsky DN. Operative surgery and topographic anatomy [In Russian]. Kursk; Moscow: Litera; 1996: p.720.
  • Kluin OS, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Neut D. Biodegradable vs non-biodegradable antibiotic delivery devices in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(3):341-51. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2013.751371
  • Tuleubaev BE, Saginova DA, Saginov AM, Koshanova AA, Tashmetov ER. Minimally invasive method for the treatment of chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis long tubular bones with damage to the bone marrow canal and a device for it implementation. Patent for invention No. 34571 dated 09/11/2020.
  • Tuleubaev BE, Saginova DA, Koshanova AA, Tashmetov ER, Saginov AM, Belyaev AM. Antibiotic impregnation of bone allograft: microbiological comparative analysis. Surgery News. 2019.5:489 - 495. https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2019.5.489
  • Tuleubaev BE, Kamyshansky EK, Azimova SD, Tashmetov ER, Koshanova AA, A histolic and hestomorphometric analysis of bone tissue regeneration with perforated bone allograft in rabbit femur defect. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Science. 202;9(A):12-18. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5588
  • Winkler H, Janata O, Berger C, Wein W, Georgo-poulos A. In vitro release of vancomycin and tobramycin from impregnated human and bovine bone grafts. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46(3):423-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/46.3.423